Migration
44. Proposal: Asylum, integration
-
Measure 44(1) - Common European Asylum Procedures
44.1) Adopting EU common rules concerning procedures for the examination of claims for international protection in Member States, applied uniformly to all asylum seekers. These procedures will have to be respectful of human dignity and international law (recommendation 29 and IT recommendations 3.8 and 4.4 p.15 and WG debate). As the reception of asylum seekers involves different actors at a national level, the EU should encourage Member States to simplify and speed up this process through a better interoperability amongst the different relevant administrations, and to set up a unique desk (one stop-shop or entry point) for asylum seekers to streamline national administrative procedures (recommendation 37 and WG debate).
-
Measure 44(2) - Revisiting the Dublin System
44.2) Revisiting the Dublin system in order to guarantee solidarity and fair sharing of responsibility including the redistribution of migrants among Member States; additional forms of support could also be envisaged (recommendations, 33, 36, 37, 40; LT recommendations 2; IT recommendations 3.8 (p.15) and NL recommendation 2 and WG debate and Plenary discussion).
-
Measure 44(3) - Enhancing Reception Standards
44.3) Enhance the minimum standards for the reception of asylum seekers laid down in directive 2013/33/EU through stronger legislative measures to improve reception facilities and accommodation. (ECP recommendation 31 and IT recommendations 5.6 (p.11) and WG debate)
-
Measure 44(4) - Special Attention to Vulnerable Groups
44.4) Special attention should be given to pregnant women, children, and particularly unaccompanied minors (recommendation 38 and WG debate).
-
Measure 44(5) - Strengthening the EU Agency for Asylum
44.5) Strengthening and increasing financial and human resources as well as management capacities of the EU Agency for Asylum to coordinate and manage the relocation of asylum seekers within the EU Member States to achieve a fair distribution (recommendations 36, 37 and LT recommendation 3 and WG debate).
There are currently no implementing initiatives that address this particular CoFE measure.